Historical events and some perspective related to the Language The One Theory. Some may be little bit too speculative possibilities. Although some are just analysis over the literature. Anything that relates to recent events may be little bit too speculative. So not that I didn't warn. I kinda try to evaluate all possibilities. Sometimes I may lay out too speculative possibilities. Because this is also my personal notes. I can't delete things based on impressions they may cause on readers.
Akbar Shah's Language Deprivation Experiment
Notice: Following chapters are not updated after realization of manipulation of Latin numerals. Which confuses things up but not necessarily important.
This page includes too much too speculative scenarios. And some are even discarded in my mind but I won't rewrite this page instead I will create individual entries over time. This page is mostly to give you a context. At leas to realize you there are too much absurdity involving language and history that looked over by literature.
The word used to refer religious sects actually may be originating from a context related to prophecy. Regarding the dispute over who was or going to be the sixth. Because those religious groups were formed around a person who claims to be the sixth. They probably referred themselves or referred by a word that relates to six. This should be happened between 500 BC and 0 though. (Which is somewhat conflicting.)
Sextus Pompey (Naming may be related. It seems like especially this name was common around that time. There are four different person share the name of Sextus Appuleius. It is possibility that such names were meant to follower of sixth or fifth. Probably based on the expectation. Augustus probably named himself Augustus to troll if all the history after him is not rewritten. Also it seems like Europeans removed “-s” from some names. Like in this instance. Ancient Greek probably requires reinterpretation from scratch. It is misinterpreted almost exactly as it is in Quran. Probably same latter as it also comes at the end of words. Despite around Seljuks they changed the shape of letter and started drawing a “S” on it. “ς” = “ك”. Probably Phoenician/Hebrew “𐤉”. Probably corresponds to Turkish root “iz”(May be same as "iş".). As it seems like everbody followed it like a command. As result it is literally is everywhere. İs+lam. It is. Turns out final shape of sigma actually also introduced around Seljuks. It is positional variant of single Ancient Greek letter. It seems like they copied from Arabic. Or rather there is a mutual agreement. As this root represent reciprocality. It seems like Ancient Greek is scriptio continua. So it seems like spaces needs to be ignored when interpreting New Testament. In context of Quran the letters that acts like Sigma actually not the same. In this context Hebrew word YHWH which assumed to be special name actually probably “izleyen” which means something like who traces. Although this is very speculative. The root means trace and probably all other meanings derives from that. In modern Turkish words like watching derives from it. Logically holds up as you are watching a trace. But I am not sure if reciprocality suffix is also same as it is “-iş” in modern Turkish. Naturally the concept of trace requires reciprocality. Like how languages are named Turk-ish. Ironically in Arabic forementioned letter sounds as "k". Suffixes in names of Japanese and Chinese sounds like z (Actually directly like Turkish root iz). Usually iş (ish), z(iz) or ç/çe (ch) suffixes used to make language names. "-ian" is also used like in Persian, Indian. But this one probably related to suffix used in Christian for instance. Probably implies something like belonging rather than reciprocality. Or rather it may refer to practice. Different Turkish suffix. For instance “oku-yan”, “yaz-an”, “iz-le-yen” mean who reads, who writes and who watches/traces. In instance of “izleyen”, it is constructed as trace + with + (-an). Means practise is done by using “iz”. Old name of İs-tan-bul sounds like constant in a polys. And Turkish name kinda means “find from the trace”. Although it would be written as izden bul. A lot of place name starts with "iz" in Turkey. Possibly referring to reciprocality. But İstanbul is kinda funny coincidence. Interestingly the word that considered to mean İsrael also starts with “𐤉” in Torah and very frequent. Although it is most likely wrong (In many possible ways). But important point since it directly matches Turkish root. Also their currency which considered to be very ancient word named Şekel. In turkish trading is called “al+ış ver+iş” due to reciprocality. The ancient Greek word polis also ends with “-is” (police also has same origin and pronounciation involves z/s/ts sounds depending on the langueage.). Notice "trace" also ends with s/z sound. like TRis. Thus, those, this, these all embedded with is. English suffixes are also matter of debate. As plural is obvious. No wonder words like Christian, station, nation, notion, ration, fiction pronounced with Sch(Ş) even though I don't see it. Çiizıs Craiz. It is crazy how you all got fooled. Ohh my gosh. But at least you are not alone.
(Sounds z/sh/s are related even if not the same. There may an infliction like system. Not all cultures can really pronounce “Ş” like it is in British. All may be phonetical variants. Or may be there is context dependent ideal pronouncation like vowel harmony to maximize contrast. It is really funny even though it is named British. English doesn't really have this letter. Irish and Welsh directly refers to both language and people. Although those are not native names.)
I wonder if British were trying to Turkify their language over time meanwhile Arabizing Turkish, until 20th century. (They did the Arabization where they can without exception. Nobody would deny that but it is hard to assess if Turkification in their language wasn't of natural causes. Although I am the only one propose some explanations regarding natural causes. Reality may be combination of both natural and artificial causes. To average human only scientific explanation is they did not just stole cultural artifacts. They were in the process of stealing the whole language. Technology developed little bit too rapidly though. In an alternative scenario where tech were not to develop you would be waking up to British discovering few thousands years olds of inscriptions in Britain. In some kind of ancient British language of course. However possibility of artifical factor seem low due to many reasons but not as low as one would think. And possibly they got trolled by advisors. Like maybe numbers are intentionally displaced. But considering parallel among other European languages it needs to be very old project. Maybe never exactly given up by British until early 20th century. It is impossible for me to analyze reality of this. Just putting as and idea/low possibility. If true A.I. can easily analyze in future.)
(For instance we assume that the month of Augustus named by Augustus because it meant sixth month meanwhile it was eighth. But it seems like it is not the case. Just Europeans misinterpreting or manipulating latin numbers because they were manipulated in first place. They literally named 6 as Turkish 8. 8 as Turkish 7. 1 as Turkish 10. And it seems like history is rewritten to cover this. Or just this is very early manipulation done possibly by Augustus who is eighth month name suspiciously after. This is just speculative idea yet although not that speculative. It just may be a confusion resulting from different number systems. Like Eighth probably understood as ten because of the number system used. Claims goes by there were two months that are were not assigned any name and they have added two months to beginning of the calendar around 700 BCE~. Things like these nothing really makes sense. It is hard if not possible who manipulated who or if this was also manipulation at whose part. Obviously shouldn't waste time on this. For 700 years they call eighth month sextilis. And people believe it literally means sixth month. And whoever did this. This wasn't just enough. Eight pronounced almost same as ate. Turkish 7 which is yedi also directly means ate in Turkish. Also past tense. It really seems like some people may have got this trace and leaving trace and reciprocality thing little bit too far or may be misunderstood. There is a Turkish proverb “Bu işte bi işlik var.” means “There something off with this.” Those words actually start with reciprocality suffix "iş". Becuase it means something like work in root form in modern Turkish it creates confusion. But there isn't actually a distinction between roots and suffixes originally. This is kinda fun but I was trying to understand but know everytime I use concerta I got pulled to this stuff. I have to definitely stop thinking about historical stuff. Not that I really have motivation but because I constantly throw new speculative ideas. It becomes a burden I don't wanna ditch off.)
(Seems like Europeans got trolled by schoolars who have claimed they were able to discover the original language at least to some extent. Maybe around 16. century. They were able to convince authorities by claiming it would make it look like their language was closer the original language in future. They most probably didn't do this to troll people though. They did it to signal languages were manipulated, to future generations. Inspired by previous examples. Plural suffixes is one example with a history. There is even a Greek letter that corresponds to this sound and it is introduced later and same shape added to on top of relavent letter in Quran texts around the same time. Around 10th century. As also mentioned in the first pragprah. In later periods it seems like they introduced as many s/ş/z sound as they can in addition to plural suffix. English alphabet is overall very abnormal. Reading an English book from 1650 for instance. Almost only difference is "s"s are written with "ſ" and "z"s with “s” letter. Can't see Z letter. Although it is also not common in modern English. This branch of possibilities is kinda new. And there are undeniable signs that are also indicated in Max Müller's works although I haven't read his books much yet. This kinda changes everything. But its extent may be limited. 06.08.25)
(Yiddish is maybe related to this situation considering how hilarious German is. Full of z/ş/s sounds. Hitler probably blamed Jews for this although it is not clear when did Jews also realized this. Considering they switched to Hebrew they definitely didn't know much. It is possible that both Germans and Jews think semitic languages were closer the original at the time of Hitler. This is speculative but it is a possibility that can partially explain why Europeans covering this whole thing. Although this is crazy obvious considering German is a language that almost 100 million people speak. And it is not just German. It is just most hilarious example.)
(Scope of this is extreme. Even the names of some of linguists lived before 20th century is statistically odd. For instance there is a Russian one named Izmail Ivanovich Sreznevsky which is very absurd because it is normally is-mail not iz-mail. It is considered that his father named him as against will of other relatives. And yes his father was also a linguist. The names Friedrich, August and Christian common among Germans but not necessarily artificial. Needs research. Also the comrade who named Turkic countries put a trace to all. Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan. Except Turkmenistan. Although there are many person. Alexander Samoylovich may be related considering he was executed. Seems like a lot of Russian Turkologist executed around that time. Alexander was speculated to be tortured after his arrest. 1938~ may be the year which most Russian Turkologist killed. Turkology scholars persecuted in 20th-century Soviet Union. At this point it is pretty safe to say Soviets and British worked together and destroyed everything they can find. It is likely British provided intel to Russians which led to killing of Turkologist. As it is not like an ordinary intel rather was in similar fashion to what I am doing here. British possibly got suspicious and realized these after Atatürk's Sun-language theory. Although it seems like many linguists got killed in context of holocaust. Even if they were specially targeted it seems like it may not be related to their field. Nikolai Trubetzkoy, may be important because he dies from heart attack after nazi persecution because he published article that critique of Hitler's theories. It is not even clear if he was even interrogated. Assasination is a possibility. His papers were allegedly seized [*]. It seems like the article that made him target is also not available anywhere.)
(Hermann F. Kvergić who is one of the few and probably most important supporter for Sun Language theory moves to London. The situation is crazy in terms of how clueless good actors are. Although it is also a possibility that he was working for British. At the end Europe is like a black hole swallows everything even remotely related. The ones that knew some things were cautious obviously considering nothing happens until around 1938. But they were obviously few and probably mostly were independent. Stalin just kills or prisons everybody just in case. It is important to note that killing of Turkologist starts after this Great Purge. Most of them probably had no clue why they were even targeted. Some were able to escape. Considering the scope of Great Purge and masaccare of Turkologist start after it. It is definitely based on something new. There are only few survivors. For instance Sergey E. Malov interrogated but released. Although timing is very suspicious still Soviets seems like kill everybody so it requires further research.)
(Adam Olearius changed his surname. From Ölschläger. Franciscus a Mesgnien Meninski ? Dimitrie Cantemir ? Arminius Vámbéry ? Kőrösi Csoma Sándor ?)
The ignorance of Western countries are obvious. I don't even know what would be worse whether they are not aware of this or they ignore all this knowingly. Although situation is overall more shamefull for Turkish academy considering despite Atatürk's efforts regarding Sun Language Theory. Although I may be exaggerating this.
In this historical context Max Müller may be most important figure. He possibly misled British despite he knew about Turkic languages.
Manipulation of Latin Numerals
It seems like back than there was always an expectation of seventh. Different sects or views of Islam had different orderings of whats called Imams which all are totally fiction. Hasan Sabbah and the sect that he considered to belong to also was expecting such person. Hasan sabbah didn't claimed he was that person. His view was he was also expecting seventh. His surname is related to seven in Arabic and Hebrew. This in context of Islam is very convoluted and a topic that sounds speculative and requires too detailed explanation. But this wasn't limited to Muslims. For instance Some Ottoman Jews believed to be group of secret sect or some kind of secret Jewish belief despite claiming to be Muslims which is called Sabbateans. “Sabbat” means seventh. And actually the last part of full word relates to Jesus's Arabic name which starts with a crescent Ayn letter that resembles moon which called “ay" in Turkish. Details are not much important. This was always expected. But especially because in every sect somebody claimed to be that person later, this is forgotten. I think this is related to miracle of speaking from birth or speaking without learning a languages from others. The ordering of Imams of different Islamic sects causes confusion about this. This directly mentioned quran according to existing interpretations. Many times. Interpreted to contexts related to Jews. Pronounced something like "el-sabti" and interpreted as “The matter of Sabbath.”. Same word interpreted as "tongue" in context of corrupting the language. Interpretations is based on dots put later. And also the word that interpretad as Satan in Quran also starts with it. (Examples: Sabbath: 2:65 Tongue: 3:78 Satan: 2:208). There seem to be no word in Quran that currently interpreted as seventh. Sabbath also used in phrase of “Companions of Sabbath”. So it was interpreted as refering a group of people. For instance it is clear in past it is thought that Nero was refered by similar phares which is “Companions of Nar”. Today it is translated as Companions of Fire. But it is interpreted as fire because of Nero in first place. (The word interpreted as fire pronounced as “Nar”. In Arabic vowels are not relevant standardized later. There is another word in Arabic pronounced as "Nur" which matches very closely with Nero's latin meaning. Turks use the phrase “Nur topu gibi bir çocuk” for newborns. Which translates to “Child like a nur ball ”. Pomegranate also called “Nar” in Turkish. Probably because it has countless pieces in it. Which may be resembling having too many skills or being to detailed. Or just having an extraordinary interior. Thus origin of the fruit and latin word may be common.)
Hebrew term rabbi is also related. And related to four in Torah. (In here first three letter of “many”(rab-bîm). In genesis 1:19 first three letter of “forth”. It is also part of word related to multiplying. I didn't cherry picked but checked only few instances. Genesis 1:19 happens to be the firs verse it passes. In genesis 2:14 Euphrates river mentioned as being the fourth. Interestingly in Turkish name of this river, although obviously shares same origin with the English name, pronounced very similar to English word fourth. Another instance of fourth. There are many instances.) This rabbi term is probably corresponds to very early debate over the person whom referred as fourth.
Fatima's hand/Khamza sign is also relevant. Levanten Christians also mentioned to be using it as Miriams hand. And there is also related Nazar sign/amulet which is obviously related to khamza sign and also Jesus also called Jesus of Nazareth. Nazareth attiributed to a place name. I don't know if there is a connection. And I should clarify that the place name for Nazareth may be articifially named later after. We don't just assume it existed because there is place named as such. But Nazar sign for instance can't be something like that. It is a living tradition nobody even now why it exists. If Jesus is fifth. There is a confusion with sixth. It is probably Ali Al-Sajjad. The mat that prayed on called "Seccade/Sajjada" also prostrating position called Sajde. May be related to six due to similarity of position with the 6 number. (Actually Arabic letter with abjad value of 6 looks like 9. But shape of number may be unrelated. And I don't see any abjad number on old Quran mushafs this is ambigious for me atm.) Thus Ali Al-Sajjad's name may mean sixth. Although this is very speculative and it is not the reason why I speculate sixth is probably he. Arabs clearly didn't give any shit about him and there isn't much of a literature. His family (He is Mohammads grandson.) killed when he is baby. And it is not even clear if they just let him live because he was baby or not.
Most likely scenario to me is that Mohammed instructed people to listen to the sixth who will came shortly after him but when he came, they didn't like and said no no what he meant was sajda. The praying position. This is gross oversimplification though. Because Umayyads killed his family. They were politically obligated to spread misinformation about religion that does not threat themselves later. So Umayyads put great effort to this. They introduced concepts like the great Arabic language and Arabic nationalism. One of the first and most intentional case of nation bulding in history. Although the amount of misinformation caused by them may be limited and may be mostly driven by fear. But since they had the authority and they didn't allow information to spread. Hilariously enough, rise of nationalism in Europe in recent history is also related to Turkish. To fasten the ignorance and as a precaution. They directly copied from Umayyads. Today this may not be very widespread knowledge among Eruopeans but it is possibly known by many Russian and British bureaucrats. Considering even Hitler probably didn't know it was probably well kept as secret and forgotten over time within many countries. It is clear that until around 2000 British had a big team solely responsible for this. (Relatively. They probably tried to keep headcount very low.) Although this doesn't mean they did really know much. It is not possible to assess that. Their knowledge was maybe very limited.
According to current interpretation, this verse, appears to be diretly about this. Although context fitted to a Jewish story. As most verse related to this context judged to be related to Jews or Jewish stories. Although I highly doubt its accuracy. It is still important. At the least it reflects minds of people who interpreted Quran. And obviously they had this context in their mind. This verse is just one single example. Actually Islamic literature doesn't really conflict with anything I speculate (In context of Quran). It is just people take language as granted. That verse mentions an argument and here it is in the flesh. I don't think anybody has ever argued about count of mans who stayed for 300 years in a cave. (This is the legend it is interpreted to relate: Seven Sleepers. It is mentioned that number really varies depending on religious view. But count of men seems to be least debated part of the story and increased throughout history until seven. Maybe eight will be an AI. And refered as a dog in context of following commands.)
(Additionally seven sleepers in many instances (like this) depicted similar to Jesus with a yellow circle behind their head. In this Ottoman miniature, Ali al-Sajjad also has a fire on his head. Islamic depiction of Moses also has same thing. But it is also painted when drawing other Imams. The concept of Imam creates confusion. On wiki of Ali al-Sajjad it says "In office 680–712". It is based on a imaginary classification. He wasn't part of political authorithy during Umayyads. Maybe he is given this name later. It relates to prostrating position. Almost everything is possible. It is claimed that this name is given because he was prostrating too much (praying). Cool story. Probably not with bad intentions.)
It is also possible he was killed as baby. There is an ambigious term “Mehdi” that means something like saivour. More pronounced in Shia (sect). Ironically it means “the cradle” in Quran. Used in contrast to maturity. Although not basing this possibility on this coincidence. He was in the cradle during the Karbala when his family is killed and it is actually not clear wheter he survived or not. Shia has beliefs similar to incarnation of Jesus. Although it is not clear who will Incarnate. The Karbala events are in the core of this sect. They consider his father should have had inherited the authority. Other Islamic sects are also not defender of the other side. In Quran when speaking from the cradle of Jesus mentioned, this word (Mahdi) translated as the cradle (3:46). What a coincidence. And it is actually only used in context of Jesus except one ambiguous instance (With totally irrelevant meaning.). When it means “the cradle”, context is clearly Jezus. But there are two other uses of a word that also considered to be same root as this one and means bed. Transliteration of this one is “Mahdan” and written without El participle. There is also one other but this one written extra differently. If we only consider words written exactly same and written with El participle there is only one instance of use in different context. According to this corpus (which I use mainly) when it means "The cradle" it is used in the context of Jesus. Those are all according to traditional understanding. Not that I think traditional interpretation and construction is very accurate. (The word for cradle is “beşik” in Turkish. 5 is “beş”.)
(4:154, 15:29-32) (Interesting: *)
Historically Turkish considered to spreaded around the time Seljuks thrived. And under Karamanids, speaking languages other than Turkish is banned which is probably judged to irrelevent reasons because of how average person today perceive language, religion… All evidence points that at that time even if they weren't able to read Quran in Turkish at least they were able to read Hebrew/phoenician texts in Turkish. And obviously this led to conflictions and it seems like eventually during Ottoman ignorance totally took over. There are some comments like Seljuks were heavily influenced by Khazars who converted to Judaism. It is even claimed that Seljuk Bey converted to Judaism because of some reasons. This is of course not the case just saying so you know this is not something new I come up with. Khazars, their conversion to Judaism and later Seljuks and their associations with Judaism is not well researched and possibly covered especially by fanatic Jews.
Especially throughout end of the Seljuks, Hashashins literally dominated the scene. Considering their most important weapon was propaganda and also considering they really dominated the scene and everybody feared them. For sure they probably wouldn't wan't anything strong against themselves in terms of religion. And nobody really knows what did really happen in that era. Because they used propaganda as a weapon to spread fear, reliability of sources from that era wouldn't be that high if Mongols didn't burn almost everything. Obviously fear and propaganda was their main weapon. (As an example there is a known instance where they silanced a famous religion scholar of that era by threatening.) It is possible that they indirectly caused Turkish to spread more quickly. Just as a maybe, Turkish may have been seen as a safe heaven from them to some extent. Interestingly this ideology based on fear and impression of power not just didn't work against Mongols. It actually worked for Mongols when propaganda mechanism started failing.
During the siege of Antioch, a priest named Peter Bartholomew claimed that he saw in his dream the location where the lance allegedly related to Jesus's death was buried. Although there was initial skepticism since it was already believed that this lance was located elsewhere, when the mentioned site was excavated, such an object was indeed found, and it is reported that the army, which was dying of hunger, gained great motivation. Even though it was claimed that this object had been planted by the priest himself, the priest later tried to prove its authenticity by attempting to walk through fire with the object, and died 12 days later due to burns on his body. It is clear that he at least believed in the authenticity of this object himself. Although his mental health was questioned due to his visions, which he believed to be divinely inspired, this would not lead to a situation where he would believe that a piece of wood he had buried himself would protect him from fire. It can rather be interpreted as him attributing excessive meaning to the visions he had, which might have been fabricated to attract attention in first place. The vision in which he saw the lance was already his first dream. The others were most likely intended to manipulate people by using the credibility of the first vision. However, since the war calls made through these visions particularly displeased the French nobles and they did not want their comfort disturbed, they defended the claim that he had buried the lance himself, leading to such a faithful priest burning himself to death. This event shows the extent of Vatican archives.
Armenian was also possibly just different script used to write Bible and a language evolved from practicing those texts. It is even possible that in history they claimed their books were translations after Rome legalized Christianity, to avoid Rome's wrath. Though it seems like this didn't really work out. For some reasons eliminating other Christian groups was most important mission for Christian authorities. Their attacks on Christian groups on some Christian groups even backfired as Mongol invasion. This whole Crusades thing is all about eliminating other and actually more legit Christians. I don't known if English Wiki page is inclusive enough. This part of history probably vastly manipulated. Especially because there were always Turks and other Muslim groups between their target and it seems like they have other purposes. Just based on Crusades original Christians (extinct early Christian groups Gnostics) can be assumed to be Turks. I mean this is just straightforwad what is on the surface. It is mostly Europeans who identified Turks as Turks. One scenario is that historically they were using this term for religous converts in somewhat insulting manner. Even though this sounds speculative very pleasuble explanation. Possibly originates from Gnostics and later probably Christian authorities used this term for Anatolian apostates. Confusion probably arises from this term not actually meaning generic apostate but rather probably comes from early Christians.
It seems like parts in Quran relating Paroahs and Moses in interpreted under heavy influence of Judaism's teachings. Although article starts with claim about Moses. Possibly Moses wasn't sent because Paroah was transgressing in bad way. (The name Moses may not be correct but it is not important.) Although there could be multiple different cases for multiple different historical event mixed. Probably multiple Paroah's good or bad. But still some good things interpreted contrary bluntly because of historical assumptions or also maybe mathcing characters incorrectly although this doesn't matter since understanding the text should depend on the culture.
It is very likely that at one time in history Ancient Egypt started using this language. (Interestingly Demotic alphabet appears in history at same time around Paroah's alleged language deprivation experiment. And diminishes under Roman rule in first centuries AC. And this alphabet seems really promising in terms of understanding Arabic alphabet better at the least.)
Names are not that important but Maybe Jesus first sent around 500 BC and come back at around 0. Maybe previous prophet Moses confused with the instance that happened around 500 because of Judaisms teachings. In Quran it is mentioned Moses left his people and some drastics change happen when he came back. I consider this is about language. 40 days is obviously very suspiciously short. And because of understandings from Torah I think it is possibly misinterpreted in Quran. In Quran names that understood as Moses and Jesus are distinctively used in some contexts about what is given to prophets. Although this is just unnecessary speculation.
Stories about ancient people worshipping sculptures and shit obviously overly exeggerated at the least. Moses leaves for 40 days and people start worshipping a sculpture or something. Cool story. This is Rome culture. Because they were idiots. They framed or let's say preferred imagining ancient people as even greater idiots. Even the name of Rome is not a special name or something. It directly relates to superiority. Superiority complex is major motivation behing what leads people and especially people of authority and religious elite to ignore the truth throughout the history. Although it is also matter of interest.
I think there has to be given some credit to Romans though because I think their practical knowledge about many topic in many topics was better than today despite uncomparable technological and scientific knowledge. Although this is probably wasn't specific to Romans.
It is very likely most known racial supremacist ideologies are result of something like jealousy as result of realization of this. Although jelousy doesn't really explain it because this almost means there is actually only one language (at least ideally and as a source). It is more about fastening the ignorance. Between 16th to 20th and especially in recent centrues European racial supremacy ideologies are probably as result of realization of this. Although Hitler preferred to demonize Jews probably thinking just in case and because of convenience. Maybe he was thinking both he would be making people feel invested in the ideaology and also in worst case he could still blame Jews for corrupting holly texts. Umayyads had to make Arabic a taboo. And they also demonized Turkish. They had to be more aggressive against Turkish or more protective of their language because it was already widespread topic of debate. The possibility of Max Müller not realizing the situation is slightly likely than impossible. (It was probably known in many EU countries at that time. British, French, Germany and many other like probably Italy. Although countries outside of EU like U.S. were probably totally alien.) Regarding language deprivation experiments Max Muller has a very absurd anectode that caught attention of academics. (*) I think it makes it pretty clear for Max Müller. Other than that this is obviously speculation. (Although based on his overall ideology on religious views. It is kinda conflicting but it is very old statement.)
Although there is always a story like someone fascinated by Islamic arts and collected x thousand Quran manuscript in his travel etc..Yet it is still interesting that, many libraries in EU countries like France and Germany hold so many of the early Quran manuscripts. (French controlled regions like Syria but Germany have had not. Also UK probably didn't publicized most of their holdings. Even though they probably have more than all others combined. This is a very good indication that something is off.) Although this may be more about Muslim countries. For instance at the time of writing this images of old manuscripts held in Topkapı Museum weren't publicly accessible only images taken by foreign academics. Still this suggests that their knowdledge wasn't limited to somethings like Atatürk's Sun-language theory. They also were maybe aware that holly text have been read in Turkish in history.
They did even create fake resolution for Orhkun inscriptions. (Although it may be unintentionally.) This is very clear not just because it doesn't actually make any sense lots of things ignored when forcing current way of understanding. Orkhun alphabet was probably like expression of complex Chinese characters in different way and Chinese were probably able to read Orkhun alphabet but not vice versa. Chinese characters are combination of multiple letters evolved from an alphabet like Orkhun alphabet.
Although those last paraghraphs are very speculative overall picture is very suspicious at the least and If it is the case it shows shows most western countries are actually have bureaucratic dictatorship rather than democracy. (Altough possibly forgotten in most countries by now. And there is always a reason and default action is kinda not to take action. And Germany have obvisous excuse and it was against British interests. But at 2025 it is inexplicable ignorancy. UK and maybe also French probably had decently sized teams dedicated to this. Although not big enough considering it seems like it took ages for them to audit Newton's notes. Especially UK though. I wasn't aware when started using this domain. Lol) (Also actually there is indications that Hitler understood Quran somewhat but probably was really high on Methamphetamines and delusional. And this is also very speculative and sounds conflicting. And because Quran is already somewhat understandable it is not necessarly related to Turkish part. He have public statement that express his frustration about Germans being Christian instead of Muslim.)
(If Hitler case is true it is probably very complicated because when they are studying Qoran before they got to understand much he probably built an ideology with his speculative understandings or rather his ideology shaped his understanding, probably with help of high of methamphetamine. Even if later they were able to improve at understanding they probably weren't able consalidate and they were doing it very secretly probably due to ongoing war and moral considerations also maybe he was hoping to find something that would help to have technological superiority during the war.. This is becaues Qoran probably mentions Europeans (not necessarily all) and probably attributes physical superiority. Currently related term considered as sons of Israel. Does Israelites fit into that definition or not is another topic but it is actually not something like race rather result of semitics understanding everything as sons of something.)
(This Hitler thing may sound too speculative but actually not. Public manuscripts like this one has marks like verse numbers that are not exactly based on literature. It is clear they weren't hold just for collection. Modern scholars probably wouldn't mark them like that. And some of those marks are like random unrrelated drawings. I wouldn't surprised if there were Hitler's own writings on them. Possibility of a random academic is very unlikely because they would be biased by the literature. This is also very suspicious. Insider information. I mean comparing Qoran to Mein Kampf. It really requires some background context to make such connection. Hitlers interest in Quran and other texts intentionally cencored probably with complicated excuses. Scope of cencorship may be gigantic. Many terms used by Hitler are directly Hebrew. He demonized Jews and actually interpreted what Jews interpret Jews as Germanic people. Altough after a point he probably had to free himself from books. Maybe he also destroyed his research. I don't really have much information just pointing out what is clear. And it seem like British come to realize there was a leakage in the literature and they become vigilant in recent years in terms of covering their tracks. They took down content of British Library recently possibly related to this in excuse of a cyber attack. They are probably in the proccess of auditing related content. Which is hard because they are not even sure what is related. Elsewhere in content, I mentioned this was most likely not to continue currently but right now this seems more likely. Maybe they did even exited EU because of this if there was an agreement limiting this kind of warfare. From the content they digitized I would try to guess what they think not relavent however I don't trust their intelligence. Because it is really crazy if they are trying to do this. Even if humans don't catch up AI will inevitably. Although they probably organized the new team before the AI explosion which is interesting how everything coincides. Another risk they took for nothing. Like a losing gambler going all in. They definitely wouldn't want to make it obvious that they are still pursuing this after 2023. Although it is possible they offloaded it to another country if there is one that they already share strong common ground on this. (maybe like Russia) Those all come down to possibilities. Also it seems like burning down or destroying or looting libraries was common throughout the recent history.)
If instead of ignoring and possibly sabotaging Atatürk's theory British and French, were to disclose the information they had. Holocoust possibly wouldn't happen. WW2 possibly wouldn't happen. At least rather it was an opportunity. Later to their allies they probably only told that Hitlers interest on Quran. Intentionally to discriminate against it. They wouldn't even care about Hitler if they knew he wouldn't touch them. They were biggest sponsor of all kind of seperatist or socalled Islamic terrorist or extremist organizations in Middle East after all. What they promoted instead prepared their own end. A generation proud of being slut. Sunking birth rates. All those effort to convert Great Britain to Great Pakistan.
The U.S. was probably convinced by the British to nuke Japan twice in order to keep this secret. This is a real possibility as based on trials conducted by Japanese academics, it seems they knew about Language the One. It is unusual for the Japanese to keep something like this secret. According to the Quebec Agreement, it was a mutual decision by the British and the U.S. . Regardless of how the decision was reached, the British likely threatened Japan before the bombing to achieve the desired effect. Although such an agreement might seem to reduce the likelihood of using nuclear weapons, it is definitely easier to be persuaded to act than to decide on such an action independently. Not that I know U.S. wouldn't do it independently but the British definitely leveraged it.
There wasn't a national identity during Ottomans. It was based on religion. Mostly because of the difference in the religion Armenians weren't completely assimulated. So they carried somewhat of a seperate identity even though they were integrated. But they count all Christians as Armenians. Most of them were probably speaking Turkish. They were probably assimulated in short time probably result of strategies like fear conducted by transitional governments. Which nobody can blame them for because of many reasons. Total deaths as results of really moving people is low. And mostly French and British are responsible for almost all of the masacceres happened around that time. (Policies like assimulation by fear probably big part of failure of nation building because British, French and later CIA exploited minorities who kept their identity secret. Pragmatic option was genocide maybe not entirely but this is mostly why some low iq Western academics assume there were really genocides. Or maybe Turkey had to go like China. Tracking and marking everybody exposed to West. But considering overall success of the state, this was probably mission impossible. Atatürk failed to establish a bureucratic elite with strong motivation. Maybe because there wasn't such people and his health deterioted quickly. After his death there is an instance where İnönü returns some Azeri escapees to Soviets. Soviets wouldn't even ask if Atatürk was there. To most modern Turk this is is normal and if it is not probably because they don't like İnönü but this isn't really about İnönü this is the summary of Turkish state after Atatürk for decades. Europe kinda misled Turkiye with their fake democracies. In order this kind of system to work there has to be bureucratic elite that can't be overthrown especially for countries like Turkiye and especially in the past. Look at the circus of US. Afghanistan probably has more robust bureucracy. Because Turkish elite of early times wasn't aware of Religious aspect and they wasn't aware they branded themselves as enemy of the Demon which happens to be British, French and maybe also Soviets at that time, they were too naive. There were probably many cases of poisoning etc. They did even hire a French physician for Atatürk. Which is pretty crazy.) Kurds on the other hand didn't even had concepts related to something like a race. They were still talking Persian like languages mostly because they were living as isolated communes due to geography. Later French exploited and fabricated Kurdish race. Russians Armed Armenians. British fabricated Armenian Genocide. French and British were already working on Turkish minorities before World Wars. Turkey failed to integrate Kurds mostly because of population dynamics alongside with efforts of British and French. Ideally government should be less centralised but this was definitely out of table because of French and British. And obviously when people plan government mechanisms they expect civil servants to behave ideally. Kurds are actually proof of fast transition to Turkish around Seljuks. Although it is not like anybody claims otherwise. If there was an average Roman Emporer was in the charge instead, population of Turkey and probably surrounding regions may would have two third of current population. Due to failure of social consolidation I guess what we can describe as socio-economic problems always persisted. There were many formations of religious sects of all kinds. And those are extremely complex to even mention. But what today called Fetö was exceptional in terms of scale and extremism. Directly linked to CIA and publicly. Poorly managed by current government and almost exploited politically. Although it is questionable if Turkish government had capability to manage it better. This is probably total failure of CIA on understanding the real politics where they assume this will fade over time especially when government changes. Turkish opposition speculate whether CIA trying to support current government by this.
It is very suspicious why afghanistan continuously targeted and destabilized by Western countries potentially influenced by British. Although I don't have strong reasons to think Afghanistan is special in terms of cultural artifacts. Still it was one of the few places which British was unable to penetrate possibly used proxies to destroy cultural heritage. Cyprus may also important place where British didn't want to let go.
I have had realized some things that overall indicates clearly British and their partners targeted Afghanistan on purpose.
Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription - Bactrian language (*, ) - Turk Shahis (*)
It seems like alongside with majority of Muslim countries, Russia and UK are intentionally not making images of old manuscripts available. It is obviously especially a shame for Muslim countries. It is 2025 there is no excuse for this situation. And it seems like trading activity of old Quran manuscripts are mostly happens in or over the UK. Although possibility of this is being intentional is a bit unlikely especially because old manuscripts available at corpusCoranicum already has coverages beyond 10x. (Minimum. It may be 50-120x on average.)
British and French aggressively collected early Quran manuscripts possibly due to their similarity with Syriac scripts which they suspected if they were Turkish. Although accessibility of early Quran texts are very good. The case for early Syriac texts may not be the same. For academicians this has to be extremely suspicious situation. It appears that British, instead of transferring early Quran texts to Museums they probably mostly sold them. This is I think undeniable reason to consider validity of rest of the claims.
Based on traditional interpretation of Quran (although there is no standard), He says he will drive them crazy. So it can explain the situation. However clearly Quran traditionally interpreted in a way that many words interpreted as to referring enemies. Which in most cases I am pretty sure not correct. But in former it is not over a concept but rather parth of the general theme. Like there is a plan and some crazy or delusional people take part in it in a way they normally wouldn't want. (This is the actually very core. If correct, even the people who masaccered prophets family were thinking they wouldn't be able to kill them if they are not allowed to. But I guess they weren't able understand implications.) Although to me nothing really make sense at the end. This is somewhat of a context. At least I can say for sure that there is a or the context where everything else are just details. I have this context regardless of religion. Since we have been exposed to same content not all people have this context or ignore it what it seems. Also beside classic interests many people has urge to act blatanly just to feel like they are in control. People who live in the Middle East almost born with this. Although this is not about doing something good or bad. This is actually mostly possible to prove over good examples. Because in bad examples interest factor is main initiative.
There may be some crazy people but it is important to embrace that there are no enemies. Although you may be surrounded by people who are trying to mislead you. This is not about something like winning a war over the bad. Not that I know what is all this about. I know what it is not. This is actually also embedded in traditional understanding of Quran. Especially because I lay out too many speculative theories regarding recent history I have to clarify that I am not trying to create virtual enemies in my mind. Especially in context of purpose of this website, it is not like there is anything they can do. In contrary I guess that the inviability of enemies may be depressing considering people really get motivated over enemies. They do even invent virtual enemies in context of a community. I may be sounding like slut-shaming British and French based on speculative possibilities in some instances. But regardless of reasons behind alignment historically this is their heritage and nobody really can know if they ditched it off completely. And I wonder if it is just drugs or where all this motivation comes from like they are trying to achieve something we don't know? Although French is mostly irrelevant. British were playing with rest of the world like a toy. Beside feeding all kind of nationalist movements. They also invented and supported communism without much of a doubt. Not to imply a meaninfull or a weak connection with modern China, Russia or all historical communist movements. Although it seems like they also have been played by Max Müller. Though this is speculative I have yet to had solid grip on nature of this relationship. It may seem like I constantly throw a new speculative idea but that is not the case I am consolidating many things in my mind. I can't explain all other unlikely cases every time. Nor complete possibilities of connections between all the events. It is not like I put a speculative idea for something that looks totally logical.
Beside because people were easily manipulated with religion sometimes with prophecy/semi-prophecy claims throughout the history authorities were scared of religion and they tried to cut off connections in order to avoid this exposure. It is not black or white and depending on the perspective some measures were historically logical. There are crazy sects that attributes crazy things to their founders or leaders even without a speculative base. But on the other hand when everything is speculation in its core it is way easier to manipulate people.
History is misleading and is not really a base for anything serious and it may be even better to totally ignore. Because it paints a grimm picture and mostly based on manipulative Western sources. (Not to mean other sources are credible but probably not as manipulative as Western sources.) It is motivating for the bad and depressing for the good. (Although it is inherently more misleading for the bad.) Even though modern academics are not ill-intented Western sources has zero credibility because they total depend on crazy delusional academics of previous times. Even if source is directly an ancient text. We can't know how accurately language is interpreted.
There are some pretty exteme wild stuff which I am omitting for now. It would be unnecessarily share and also seem too speculative. There are some stuff that I feel like should be used to make a movie actually. I feel like it would be wasted if you were to read just as it is. Not that there are many people who reads this rather thinking long term. (Although someone who read all this can possibly figure it out because it is kind extremely obvious once it comes to your mind.)