Language The One Theory (Considering to name “Mona Lisa” ). According to this theory: Semitic languages such as Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic — and possibly also Greek, Armenian, Syriac, and perhaps other languages — actually emerged as a result of distortions or variations in the reading and understanding of holly texts. Jesus, Moses, and possibly other prophets miraculously spoke this language from birth. The reason why this language will be referred with “Turkish” within the scope of the theory is the claim that both its regular structure and phonetic similarities place it at a level where they could be classified as in the same language family. This theory does not claim that Turkish has been preserved in its entirety. Rather, the languages referred to as Turkish are the least distorted form of that original single language. The way this language used in holly texts originally may be substantially different.
The Turkish Language Theory is similar to the Sun Language Theory proposed by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.
¶ Historical and Etymological Artifacts
It is speculated that the miraculous speech exhibited by various prophets as babies or children was referred to at the time with the Turkish word "Bakış" ("to look at each other" or “gaze” or “look”; -ış is reciprocal suffix thus former is ideal meaning.). The hand gesture in the iconic portrait of Jesus is also thought to symbolize the word “Bakış” (as an example, consider eye contact in sign language). Similar gestures can be found in Jewish and Christian cultures. It is suggested that the word “Bekos”, reportedly uttered by babies in the linguistic isolation experiment allegedly conducted by the Pharaoh, and the Ancient Greek word “bakis”, may have originated from the Turkish word “Bakış”. Since Moses was taken from his family as a baby by Pharaoh and later had difficulty speaking with his own people—leading him to use Aaron like translator—it is being considered that the babies in Pharaoh’s experiment might have been Moses and Aaron. (See Exodus 4:14–16.)
The reason this miracle is associated with the word “bakış” is said to be that these prophets, as babies, would mutter this word in a state of astonishment when making eye contact with others. This is because people often mutter the word that is most strongly evoked in moments of sudden surprise. Eye contact is a highly exciting event for babies. (Although normal babies get used to it by the age of two or so, for a baby who doesn’t see many people, eye contact with strangers can remain a source of intense excitement and astonishment for a long time. By the time normal babies begin to speak, they are already used to making eye contact.) Later, those who heard this word might have used it when describing the event to others, leading to this miracle and these prophets being associated with the word “bakış”. In Ancient Greek, the word bakis has precisely this meaning. In fact, the confusion caused by this dual meaning has been noted in various sources. (Also check: 🪬)
While only one language for each evolved from the Torah and the Quran, many different languages emerged from Bible due to Christians being hidden under Roman oppression and dispersed to various regions. Considering that some fled deep into Africa, the extent of the pressure may have been even greater than what current historical sources convey. Very few writings from that era have survived. In later periods, the Crusades targeted Christian groups who had stopped hiding themselves. During the Crusades, there were also incidents suggesting that early Christian records might have been in the possession of European religious authorities. (See: Historical events related to the Turkish Language Theory.)
Although the Roman Empire systematically destroyed such material, the fact that no Bible manuscript from before 300 CE has been found in Turkey is a difficult issue to explain. Some fragments have been discovered in neighboring countries.
In the early period of Christianity, it is known that hidden Christian groups used various coded writings. The general defining characteristic of these groups was concealment. For example, Egyptian Christians are likely called Copts in relation to the Latin word crypto, meaning "hidden." This term is also used to refer to the ancient Egyptian language. Interestingly, the language of African Christians who claim to possess the original Gospels is called Ge'ez, pronounced very similar to Turkish word for secret “giz”. In Turkish, the word kirpi (porcupine) is also etymologically related to the idea of protection. The full name of the animal we call kirpi today is actually oklu kirpi (spiked porcupine). Similarly, the same name has been given to an armored vehicle produced in Turkey. See: crypt. This word is significant because the connection of other words derived from this root to Christianity might seem unclear at first glance. Also the fact that crypt starts with "cry" is whole another topic but very important in context of Quran. If this all is coincidence, everything is. Indeed is but with what?
(Origin of “crypt” is probably paleo hebrew “𐤀” letter. Because it exactly looks like eyelesh (Pronounced as “kirpik” in Turkish.) and it acutally doesn't have a sound normally. It caused problem with understanding texts and later people started saying crypt for things that are not understood thus this term evolved. Also crop/trim is called (kırp) in Turkish. Interestingly “𐤀” letter also looks like a trimming tool. Also to blink called “göz kırp-mak” in Turkish. From the verb crop/trim “kırp”. “𐤀” letter corresponds to latin Alpha. And words like alphabet and elephant derives from it. Alphabet because it is complete set of letters and elephant is probably because of its size. In Quran corresponding letter used to split compound words. In Quron name of this letter means something like "time" like 5 time. So it is something like max. Also: Alp mountains. ; Don't confuse letter and its name. It has names like Aleph/Eliph/Alpha but those are names of the letter. Not what letter directly corresponds to in texts. In Paleo Hebrew it probably named as so because animals got fat enough to be slaughtered called that.)
¶ What's with the squint-eyes
It is not clear yet but in Turkish this condition called “şaşı”. To surprised is “şaş-ır-mak”. If “şaş” means focus then “şaş-ır-mak” would mean
being out of focus. Although not claiming "şaşı" derives its meaning from focus. Forementioned meanings are literal translations of their almost exclusive usages today. (Bakış <=> şaşı. As claimed that they uttered bakış because they got surprized by eye contact.) Interestingly Christians, or most English speaker, usually say “Jesus” when they get surprised.
Also in Da Vinci's Jesus depiction Salvator mundi he is holding a transparent ice ball. It is probably relates to Jesus original name which probably related to Turkish words “ay” and “ayna” which means "moon" and “mirror”. In Quran both eye and Jesus words starts with Ayn (ﻋـ) letter. Actually in some instances it seems like it is a possbility that Jesus name interpreted as eye and “we told Maryam to rest her eye” understood instead of probably “resting her baby.”
¶ Mona Lisa
It seems likte it is painting of Da Vinci's mother. This one is straightforward craziness as it seems like pretty clear that this is depiction of his mother. Still crazy claims abouts it is being someone elses portraits ghosting around everywhere. There is even a claim that Da Vinci reflected his mother's smile but person is not her mother. There is an even a claim it is Da Vinci herself. This is no joke. She was probably speaking Turkish and the name “Mona Lisa” is something like anagram for single language. Like Mono Lisan. It seems like her lips are intentially painted to look like fastened. Different sources claims her origin was somewhere around black sea or Caucasus. (There are also claims that the letter Da Vinci sent to Sultan about bridge construction is written originally in Ottoman Turkish. And also its language is little bit to nice against Sultan. Although it may be normal for that time.)
¶ Connections with racist movements and some thoughts on recent history
It is very likely most known racial supremacist ideologies are result of something like jealousy as result of realization of this. Although jelousy doesn't really explain it because this almost means there is actually only one language (at least ideally and as a source). It is more about fastening the ignorance. Between 16th to 20th and especially in recent centrues European racial supremacy ideologies are probably as result of realization of this. Although Hitler preferred to demonize Jews probably thinking just in case and because of convenience. Maybe he was thinking both he would be making people feel invested in the ideaology and also in worst case he could still blame Jews for corrupting holly texts. Umayyads had to make Arabic a taboo. And they also demonized Turkish. They had to be more aggressive against Turkish or more protective of their language because it was already widespread topic of debate. The possibility of Max Muller not realizing the situation is slightly likely than impossible. (It was probably known in many EU countries at that time. British, French, Germany and many other like probably Italy. Although countries outside of EU like U.S. were probably totally alien.) Regarding language deprivation experiments Max Muller has a very absurd anectode that caught attention of academics. (*) I think it makes it pretty clear for Max Muller. Other than that this is obviously speculation. (Although based on his overall ideology on religious views. It is kinda conflicting but it is very old statement.)
Although there is always a story like someone fascinated by Islamic arts and collected x thousand Quran manuscript in his travel etc..Yet it is still interesting that, many libraries in EU countries like France and Germany hold so many of the early Quran manuscripts. (French controlled regions like Syria but Germany have had not. Also UK probably didn't publicized most of their holdings. Even though they probably have more than all others combined. This is a very good indication that something is off.) Although this may be more about Muslim countries. For instance at the time of writing this images of old manuscripts held in Topkapı Museum weren't publicly accessible only images taken by foreign academics. Still this suggests that their knowdledge wasn't limited to somethings like Atatürk's Sun-language theory. They also were maybe aware that holly text have been read in Turkish in history.
They did even create fake resolution for Orhkun inscriptions. (Although it may be unintentionally.) This is very clear not just because it doesn't actually make any sense lots of things ignored when forcing current way of understanding. Orkhun alphabet was probably like expression of complex Chinese characters in different way and Chinese were probably able to read Orkhun alphabet but not vice versa. Chinese characters are combination of multiple letters evolved from an alphabet like Orkhun alphabet.
Although those last paraghraphs are very speculative overall picture is very suspicious at the least and If it is the case it shows shows most western countries are actually have bureaucratic dictatorship rather than democracy. (Altough possibly forgotten in most countries by now. And there is always a reason and default action is kinda not to take action. And Germany have obvisous excuse and it was against British interests. But at 2025 it is inexplicable ignorancy. UK and maybe also French probably had decently sized teams dedicated to this. Although not big enough considering it seems like it took ages for them to audit Newton's notes. Especially UK though. I wasn't aware when started using this domain. Lol) (Also actually there is indications that Hitler understood Quran somewhat but probably was really high on Methamphetamines and delusional. And this is also very speculative and sounds conflicting. And because Quran is already somewhat understandable it is not necessarly related to Turkish part.)
(If Hitler case is true it is probably very complicated because when they are studying Qoran before they got to understand much he probably built an ideology with his speculative understandings or rather his ideology shaped his understanding, probably with help of high of methamphetamine. Even if later they were able to improve at understanding they probably weren't able consalidate and they were doing it very secretly probably due to ongoing war and moral considerations also maybe he was hoping to find something that would help to have technological superiority during the war.. This is becaues Qoran probably mentions Europeans (not necessarily all) and probably attributes physical superiority. Currently related term considered as sons of Israel. Does Israelites fit into that definition or not is another topic but it is actually not something like race rather result of semitics understanding everything as sons of something.)
¶ Potential reasons for why it is not known:
- To bots religion is just politics and potentially a political weapon so people considered to posses it targeted throughout history. Especially by people who trained to posses power. (You can ask chatGPT with this condition.) And literate people intentionally targeted many times because they didn't stay silent. (There are many instances in Islamic history where prominent people, even close relatives of prophet, masaccered yet nobody really knows exactly why and this happens shortly after prophets death. Although this is still an improvement considering Christianity is solely based on death of a prophet.) This also explains why Turkish spread over easily in areas with weak central authority and within small communes. (Steppe people).
- In the past, written texts could be read by very few people, and the language taught by the prophets was forgotten before it could spread in periods without prophets or was manipulated by political authorities.
- Due to Turkish being a completely regular language, Turkish texts are more prone to being read in different ways.
- People tend to focus on topics they can generally understand and specialize in. They tend to avoid subjects that are hard to prove, seem unlikely, or are difficult to research—especially complex topics that appear unsolvable.
- People are psychologically and behaviorally highly troubled. (Those who oppose this theory without reason should question themselves and find out why.)
- People engaged in related fields tend to be more obsessive and fanatical compared to others, and other people don't really care much and tend to trust those individuals.
¶ Reasons that lead one to consider this theory:
- In Semitic languages, words are formed by derivation from simple roots, and while this can be understood when reading the text, the pronunciation often makes it difficult to distinguish these roots. Which make one question how did this language developed in first place.
- There is a general consensus that the holly texts that gave rise to these languages were read in very different ways and only later became standardized.
- There are many unexplained phenomena in the understanding of these holy texts today.
- There is no reason not to consider this theory but only assumptions.
- These languages appeared on the historical stage alongside their respective holy books.
- These languages has gender system. Something without any utility. Existence of this system even when everything put aside is enough to be suspicious of something is wrong.
¶ State of the Theory
_(1881-1938)_in_westers__sfa003017837.jpg)
This theory can only be clarified—if it is correct—by decoding the Turkish reading of the sacred texts or by understanding the sacred texts as structured compositions.
As of now, there is no evidence that these texts can be read in a way that supports this theory.
Regarding Torah, assuming text haven't been changed except minor defetcts if it was originally written in assumed single language it should be really not that hard to read. At least that was my assumption as editor. However it is obviously very ambigious and exhausting task. And because it seems like current understanding is mostly fiction and even words are seperated mostly wrongly. (There wasn't even spaces in original texts) So it is not possible to use current meanings of words. (Current way of reading holly texts first underfits and than adds vowel marks to extend anyway so it is hilarious that if you think this is a crazy theory. A judgement totally based on assumptions. Academy's approach is totally like let's see what those cavemen tried to carve so they don't have much expectations for logic nor consistency. This is the classic approach for all ancient texts. Meanwhile they speak a langauge of with gender system and as irregular and inconcistent as one can get. So their standards are pretty low when comes to those aspects.)
Unlike Torah, Quran is very workable becuase of pretty straightforward reasons even explained in Quran itself. At least integrity is very clear. Words with same meaning connected with lines. This is very extensive whole another topic though. As editor don't know about New Testament. But integrity is beyond real concern. Even though Koine Greek has some interesting sides.